Legal Opinion

State v. . Hunt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1943PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNB, J.

Careful consideration of the several assignments of error upon which defendants challenge the judgments below fails to indicate prejudicial error.

Exceptions 2 and 3 are taken to the denial by the court of motions of defendant Hunt (1) to strike out testimony of witness as to what appeared upon the person of this defendant when examined by a doctor on.the night of the alleged crime, as set forth in the narrative herein, and (2) that court instruct the jury to disregard such testimony. In this connection it appears of record that these motions were not made until the State had rested its case,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . HowleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  2. State v. . MerrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. State v. . CashSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. State v. . PittsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. GaineySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. LloydSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API