Littoral Development Co. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commission
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERSON, P. J.
In order to protect San Francisco Bay from further environmental degradation through filling and development, the Legislature created the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), and gave BCDC jurisdiction over all areas of the bay subject to “tidal action”—which for purposes relevant here the Legislature defined in Government Code 1 section 66610. This statute specifically defined San Francisco Bay, for purposes of BCDC jurisdiction and as here pertinent, as including all sloughs; “marshlands’’ extending from a seaward line of “mean high tide”…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Knight v. United States Land Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pulaski v. California Occupational Safety & Health Standards BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Lechuza Villas West v. California Coastal Com.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- California School Boards Ass'n v. State Board of EducationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Littoral Development Co. v. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. AubryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.