Legal Opinion
Lechuza Villas West v. California Coastal Com.
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 19, 1997No. Docket Nos. B105571, B110008PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, Acting P. J.
A
Factual and Procedural Background
In 1990, Lechuza Villas West, a California limited partnership (Lechuza), purchased unimproved beachfront property in Malibu from the Adamson Company for approximately $2 million (the property). The property consists of 17 legally subdivided contiguous lots, on which Lechuza wishes to build Tract No. 10630, which was subdivided by the Marblehead Land Company as shown on a tract map recorded in 1932 (the 1932 Tract Map). The subdivision was subject to covenants, conditions and restrictions also recorded by the Marblehead Land…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Yee v. Mobilehome Park Rental Review BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Burke v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Chao Fu, Inc. v. Wen Ching ChenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Bollay v. Office of Administrative LawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Wright v. CITY OF MORRO BAYCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.