Legal Opinion
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Aubry
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 29, 1996No. A069548PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERSON, P. J.
Appellant Unions contend the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State of California (Director) committed a prejudicial abuse of discretion when he determined that certain sums deducted from workers’ wages and repaid to employers, as wage rebates, should not be counted in calculating the “actually prevailing” wage rates for specified jobs, under the provisions of Labor Code section 1773 (section 1773) and title 8, California Code of Regulations, section 16000 (regulation 16000).
We find no such abuse of discretion, and affirm the trial court’s order…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lusardi Construction Co. v. AubryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Building And Construction Trades Department, Afl-Cio v. ReichCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Independent Roofing Contractors of California, Inc. v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Cole v. City of Oakland Residential Rent Arbitration BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Ruth v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Associated Builders And Contractors Of Southern California, Inc. v. NunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- California Slurry Seal Ass'n v. Department of Industrial RelationsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Associated Builders & Contractors of Southern California, Inc. v. NunnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004