Legal Opinion
Leen v. Demopolis
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 2, 1991No. 25399-9-IPublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
Chris Demopolis appeals the order denying his motion for an order vacating entry of a default judgment and confirming the order of default. Demopolis argues that the trial court erroneously (1) made factual determinations based upon conflicting affidavits; (2) found that Demopolis's actions prior to the entry of the default order did not constitute an appearance before the court; (3) entered an award that exceeded the relief requested in the complaint; and (4) modified its decision without permission from the appellate court. We affirm.
On October 31, 1988, attorney David Leen filed a summons…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ellis v. CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Lamon v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
- White v. HolmWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Corinthian Corp. v. White & Bollard, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Tradewell Group, Inc. v. MavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Sintra, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Marassi v. LauCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1993
- Stiles v. KearneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.