Legal Opinion

Marassi v. Lau

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 6, 1993No. 30556-5-IPublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

The appellant, Dynasty Development Corporation (Dynasty), challenges the trial court's award of attorney fees to the respondents, Nicholas and Debra Marassi. The fees were awarded pursuant to a provision in the parties' purchase and sale agreement allowing the successful party in a suit to recover reasonable attorney fees. We reverse, holding that both parties prevailed on distinct issues requiring a proportional award of fees.

The Marassis contracted with Dynasty to purchase a lot in a housing development known as Windsor Shores located in Snohomish County. As part of the agreement, Dynasty…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Schmidt v. Cornerstone Investments, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. American Nursery Products, Inc. v. Indian Wells OrchardsWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Anderson v. Gold Seal Vineyards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Singleton v. FrostWashington Supreme Court · 1987

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Torgerson v. One Lincoln Tower, LLCWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Phillips Building Co., Inc. v. AnCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. King County v. CENTRAL PUGET SOUND GROWTHWashington Supreme Court · 1999

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API