Sintra, Inc. v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
935 P.2d 555 (1997)
131 Wash.2d 640
SINTRA, INC., an Oregon corporation qualified and doing business in Washington, Keith H. Hamack and Patty L. Hamack, husband and wife and their marital community; Arthur M. Stanley and Susan S. Stanley, husband and wife, and their marital community, Respondents/Cross Appellants,
v.
The CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, Holly Miller and John Gayman, her husband; Ovid Thompson, a single person; David Moseley and Jane Doe Moseley, his wife, Beatrice Ryan and John Doe Ryan, her husband, Appellants/Cross Respondents.
No. 62304-0.
Supreme Court of Washington,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited112 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by92 opinions
- Yousoufian v. Office of Ron SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- Cox v. SpanglerWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Cox v. SpanglerWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Mission Springs, Inc. v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Mission Springs Inc. v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1998
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.