Legal Opinion

Corinthian Corp. v. White & Bollard, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1968No. 38968PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This action stemming from a transaction in 1957 involves three Washington corporations: (1) Corinthian Corporation (plaintiff-respondent); (2) White & Bollard, Inc., (defendant-appellant) i 1 and (3) Corley Mortgage Co., Inc., (defendant-appellant and cross-appellant). We refer to the parties as Corinthian, W & B, and Corley.

This complex 2 controversy orbits around the nature, interpretation, application, and alleged breach of a written agreement, entitled “Option Agreement,” dated June 19, 1957, entered into by Corinthian and W & B.

Nature of the Case

In general, this is an action by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. McFerran v. HerouxWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Titus v. Tacoma Smeltermen's Union Local No. 25Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Puget Sound Mutual Savings Bank v. LillionsWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Valley Land Office, Inc. v. O'GRADYWashington Supreme Court · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Boyd v. DavisWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Levy v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. McCutcheon v. BrownfieldCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  4. Antwerp Diamond Exchange of America, Inc. v. Better Business Bureau of Maricopa County, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Scymanski v. DufaultWashington Supreme Court · 1971

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API