Legal Opinion

Stiles v. Kearney

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 29, 2012No. 41289-6-IIPublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohanson, J.

¶1 — Dee Ann Stiles filed a defamation complaint against Gerald Kearney. After granting Kearney’s summary judgment motion, the trial court found Stiles’s complaint was frivolous, the defamation claim was not supported by the law or facts, and that Stiles’s attorney had failed to conduct a reasonable inquiry before filing the complaint. Stiles and her attorney, Arleta Young, appeal, raising numerous procedural and substantive challenges to the trial court’s imposition of CR 11 and RCW 4.84.185 sanctions. Discerning no error, we affirm the trial court’s sanction decisions. We also hold that…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Wenatchee Sportsmen Ass'n v. Chelan CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Mark v. Seattle TimesWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Willener v. SweetingWashington Supreme Court · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Gunn v. RielyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Theresa & Kent Boyle, V John & Brenda LeechCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  3. McCarthy v. TaylorIllinois Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Wade Webster, V. Thomas LitzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  5. Toensing v. Attorney Gen. of Vt.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2019

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API