Legal Opinion
Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 3, 1982No. 81-402PublishedCited by 323 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliam B. Brown, J.
The sole issue raised in this appeal is whether the trial court properly granted appellees’ motion to dismiss appellants’ complaint on the grounds that an employee is barred by Section 35, Article II of the Ohio Constitution, and R. C. 4123.74 and 4123.741 from prosecuting an action at law for an intentional tort.
At the outset, it must be remembered that the appellants are appealing from an order granting a motion to dismiss pursuant to Civ. R. 12(B)(1) and (6). In O’Brien v. University Community Tenants Union (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 242, this court stated that “[i]n order for a court to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
- Whirlpool Corp. v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Mandolidis v. Elkins Industries, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1978
- Northwestern National Casualty Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin v. Edward A. McNulty and Walter Scott SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by323 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Fyffe v. Jeno's, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Woodson v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
318 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.