Peterson v. Teodosio
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephenson, J.
The initial question this appeal presents is whether the cause of action, as pleaded in the complaint in this case, is barred by the statutes of limitation.*165* The next question is, if so barred, whether the trial court committed prejudicial error in overruling appellee’s motion to file an amended complaint.
In deciding the initial question of the applicability of the statutes of limitation, three subsidiary questions must be considered: (1) Is the accrual of a cause of action by a deceased partner’s estate against a surviving partner dependent upon the appointment of a representative of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Andrianos v. Community Traction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1951
- Kincheloe v. FarmerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- Gilmore v. . HamNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Ulmer v. Fulton, Supt.Ohio Supreme Court · 1935
- FOUCHEK v. JanicekOregon Supreme Court · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by432 opinions
- Hambleton v. R.G. Barry Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
- In Re: Marilyn E. Morris, Debtor. John Poss v. Marilyn E. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Viock v. Stowe-Woodward Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State ex rel. Midwest Pride IV, Inc. v. PontiousOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Wilmington Steel Products, Inc. v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
427 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.