Legal Opinion
Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Conant
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 17, 1999No. AC 18442PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*530 Opinion
LAVERY, J.
In this appeal from a judgment of foreclosure, the sole claim of the defendants James E. Conant and Rita Conant1 is that the trial court improperly denied their application for protection from foreclosure (application),2 pursuant to General Statutes §§ 49-31d through 49-3 lj. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found the following facts with respect to the defendants’ application. On September 24, 1985, the defendants signed an adjustable rate note in the original principal amount of $389,000, which note was secured by a mortgage deed on their home at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Timm v. TimmSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Gillis v. GillisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- E. M. Loew's Enterprises, Inc. v. SurabianSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- BayBank Connecticut, N.A. v. ThumlertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kelley v. TomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. OwenConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Rosenblit v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Kubish v. ZegaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Thompson v. OrcuttConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.