Legal Opinion
BayBank Connecticut, N.A. v. Thumlert
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 14, 1992No. 14392PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether the thirty day time limit specified in General Statutes § 49-14 (a)1 for filing a motion for a deficiency judgment in a mortgage foreclosure action is applicable to a judgment of foreclosure by sale. Concluding that the time limitation contained in § 49-14 (a) governs a motion for a deficiency judgment following a foreclosure by sale, the trial court, Goldberg, J., denied as untimely the motion for a deficiency judgment filed by the plaintiff, BayBank Connecticut, N.A., against the named defendant, H. Donald Thumlert (defendant). The plaintiff…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Orticelli v. PowersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Society for Savings v. Chestnut Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Heffernan v. SlapinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- New England Savings Bank v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- In re Bruce R.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Dos Santos v. F. D. Rich Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Bank of Stamford v. AlaimoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.