Legal Opinion
Thompson v. Orcutt
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 18, 2002No. AC 19769PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PELLEGRINO, J.
This foreclosure action comes to us on remand from our Supreme Court. Thompson v. Orcutt, 257 Conn. 301, 777 A.2d 670 (2001). The plaintiff, George A. Thompson, trustee, previously appealed to this court from the judgment of the trial court determining that he had unclean hands, and ordering him to release a mortgage and the underlying note to the defendants, David Orcutt and Sandra Orcutt. We reversed the judgment on the ground that the doctrine of unclean hands did not apply as a defense to the plaintiffs foreclosure of the mortgage because the wrong committed by the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pandolphe's Auto Parts, Inc. v. Town of ManchesterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Farmers & Mechanics Savings Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Gulack v. GulackConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Thompson v. OrcuttSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Wallenta v. MoscowitzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- McKeever v. FioreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Fenner v. Hartford Courant Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Alexander v. TysonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- St. John Urban Development Corp. v. ChisholmConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.