Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2013No. CC 091131; CA A145081; SC S060134PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, C. J.

In this criminal case, defendant was charged with criminally negligent homicide after he allegedly drove while under the influence of intoxicants and struck another vehicle, killing one of its occupants. During the investigation of the crime, a police officer read defendant the statutory implied consent warnings as required by ORS 813.100(1) and ORS 813.130,1 and defendant agreed to provide blood and urine samples. Before trial, defendant moved to suppress the test results from those samples, arguing that his consent was involuntary because it was obtained after he had been warned of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. State v. NewtonOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. DouglasOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  4. State v. MacHucaOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. State v. WilliamsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. CivilCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  3. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. McCoy v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. MazzolaOregon Supreme Court · 2015

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API