Legal Opinion

State v. Newton

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1981No. TC M79-783 CA 16311 and SC 27149PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*790TANZER, J.

In this prosecution for driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 487.540, the district court suppressed evidence of a breathalyzer test of the defendant’s blood alcohol content and the state appealed. The Court of Appeals affirmed on the basis of our decision in State v. Scharf, 288 Or 451, 605 P2d 690, rehearing den 288 Or 621 (1980).

In State v. Scharf this court divided on whether a denial of access to counsel violated Oregon’s implied consent statute and required exclusion. A majority held that ORS 487.805 as a matter of legislative policy, assured to an arrested person a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. SpencerOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. DonlaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  5. State v. SparklinOregon Supreme Court · 1983

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API