Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. Keliher
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.
Although the questions presented by the plaintiff’s petition might have been raised as matters of defence to a bill in equity brought by the defendants Ethel W. Adams and Joseph V. Adams against the plaintiff company to secure the payment of their judg ments against the defendant Keliher in accordance with the procedure approved by this court in Sanders v. Insurance Co., 72 N. H. 485, a petition for a declaratory judgment like that now before us appears to be the only recognized method by which the plaintiff company could, of its own motion, secure a decision of the questions here involved.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coleman v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Bachhuber v. BoosalisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Watkins v. WatkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Medical Protective Co. v. Light AdmxOhio Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by17 opinions
- O'MORROW v. BoradCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. CochraneOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArghyrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949
- Pennsylvania Threshermen and Farmer's Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. Emily S. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1956
- MFA Mutual Insurance Co. v. CheekAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.