Legal Opinion

Watkins v. Watkins

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1933PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed December 6, 1932:

Rosenberry, C. J..

One of the errors assigned is that the trial court denied the defendant Employers Mutual Indemnity Corporation’s motions for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence. The fourth paragraph of the answer of the Employers Mutual Indemnity Corporation is as follows:

“4. Alleges that the said insurance policy contained the following express condition and stipulation, among others, to wit:-‘FI. No action, shall lie against the company to recover upon any claim or for any loss defined herein unless brought after the amount…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Home Insurance v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Tweeddale v. TweeddaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Buckner v. BucknerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Pawlowski v. EskofskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Bergstein v. PopkinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hunt v. DollarWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  2. DeKeyser v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Winnebago Homes, Inc. v. SheldonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Ford v. City of CaldwellIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Horton v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API