Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Cochrane
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
At the opening of the trial in the instant case, counsel for the defendants moved the court to dismiss plaintiff’s petition for the reason that it was insufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the court under the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act of this state. The court overruled the motion and the defendants now complain that the trial court erred in this respect.
This motion, in the nature of a demurrer, attacked the sufficiency of the petition. The trial court in ruling upon it was obliged to assume the well pleaded allegations of the petition to be true and to construe such allegations…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Robertson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
- Schaefer v. First National BankOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Luntz v. SternOhio Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- State v. PostOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- Mid-American Fire & Casualty Co. v. HeasleyOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Hamilton, Superintendent v. VerdowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Post v. BradshawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Columbia Casualty Co. v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.