Bachhuber v. Boosalis
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCrownhart, J.
The action is to recover damages to plaintiff’s automobile in a collision, wherein the defendant *575Boosalis is chárged with negligence causing the damage. The insurer of Boosalis was made a party on the theory of direct liability to plaintiff under sec. 85.25, Stats.
Service was had upon the defendant Boosalis by service on the secretary of state, pursuant to sub. (3), sec. 85.15, Stats., and upon the defendant insurance company by service on the insurance commissioner, pursuant to sub. (2) (b), sec. 201.38. The defendant Boosalis failed to appear. The defendant insurance company answered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Foster v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Underwood Veneer Co. v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Stransky v. KousekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hynding v. Home Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Conold v. SternOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- Eakle v. HayesWashington Supreme Court · 1936
- Employers Ins. Co. of Alabama v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Home Indemnity Co. of New York v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.