Legal Opinion

Andor v. United Air Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 14, 1986No. A8301-00133; CA A32141PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*313ROSSMAN, J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover compensatory and punitive damages arising out of the crash of United Air Lines Flight 173 in Portland on December 28,1978. Plaintiff was a passenger on the plane and named United and McBroom, the pilot, as defendants. United admitted liability for compensatory damages on the basis of McBroom’s conceded negligence but contended that plaintiff was not entitled to punitive damages. Plaintiff based her claim for punitive damages on the alleged “negligence, flagrant misconduct and deliberate disregard of the rights and safety of others” by the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Noe v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Artman v. RayOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State Ex Rel. Young v. CrookhamOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Harrell v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Stroud v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Andor v. United Air Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Andor v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Harris v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API