Legal Opinion

Stroud v. Denny's Restaurant, Inc.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1975PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

This is an action by plaintiff for malicious prosecution. A jury returned a verdict for plaintiff for general and punitive damages, and defendant appeals. The only issue is whether the trial court erred in refusing to withdraw punitive damages from the jury’s consideration.

Plaintiff, his wife, and two friends went to defendant’s restaurant to have an early morning breakfast. Plaintiff ordered sausage, eggs, hash browns and toast. The menu indicated the toast contained melted butter. When plaintiff’s breakfast arrived the toast did not have melted butter on it; instead a frozen or refrigerated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Northrup v. Miles Homes, Inc. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Noe v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Pelton v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Starkweather v. ShafferOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Western Coach Corporation v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Chesterman v. BarmonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Embrey v. HollyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  3. Dahl v. SittnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Protectus Alpha Navigation Co., Ltd. v. North Pacific Grain Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  5. Briner v. HyslopSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API