Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Young v. Crookham

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 4, 1980No. TC A7704-05707 etc. SC 26305PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*63LENT, J.

The issue in this case is whether Oregon should adopt the so-called "one bite” or "first comer” theory of punitive damages whereby, in multiple litigation arising from a continuing episode, the award of exemplary damages to one plaintiff would preclude the recovery of punitive damages for all subsequent plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs are 75 persons1 who claim to have been exposed to E coli bacteria resulting in severe gastrointestinal illness while visiting Crater Lake Lodge in Crater Lake National Park. Defendant is the presiding judge of the Multnomah County Circuit Court.

Defendant circuit…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. FoustSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Noe v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Van Lom v. SchneidermanOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Martin v. CambasOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Roshak v. LeathersOregon Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. James Leroy Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corporation and Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Hawkins v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. In re "Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1983
  5. Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API