Legal Opinion

Occidental Chemical Corp. v. OHM Remediation Services Corp.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided June 25, 1997No. 94-CV-959S(H)PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case has been referred to the undersigned by Hon. William M. Skretny for all pretrial matters, including the hearing and disposition of non-dispositive motions, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). Defendant has moved to compel the production of documents as to which plaintiff has assert*433ed attorney-client privilege and/or work product protection. What follows is this court’s ruling on certain issues which the parties agree will significantly narrow the discovery dispute addressed by defendant’s pending motion.

BACKGROUND

As…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Louis KovelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  5. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon HorowitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Viacom, Inc. v. Sumitomo Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  2. Hertzberg v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  3. Energy Capital Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  4. Perfection Corp. v. Travelers Casualty & SuretyOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API