Legal Opinion
Energy Capital Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 11, 2000No. 97-293 CPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Judge.
On June 22, 1999, the Defendant filed a motion to compel that raised three discreet issues. With admirable professionalism, the parties expeditiously completed briefing the contentious legal issues to maintain the schedule set for this case. The Court, after hearing oral argument, ruled on the motion to compel on July 14, 1999. The ruling, however, did not explain the Court’s decision. This opinion is intended to address the interesting issues raised in the motion to compel.
I. Facts
Under a contract called the AHELP agreement, the Plaintiff agreed to provide loans for…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Eden Isle Marina, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Evergreen Trading, LLC ex rel. GN Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Deseret Management Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.