Legal Opinion

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided January 25, 2006No. 04-74CPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEWITT, Judge.

OPINION

The court has before it Defendant’s Motion to Compel the Production of Documents and Deposition Testimony Improperly Withheld on the Basis of Privilege (Def.’s Mot. or Motion), PG & E’s Response to Defendant’s Motion to Compel the Production of Documents and Testimony Withheld as Privileged (PL’s Resp. or Response), and Defendant’s Reply to Plaintiffs Response to Defendant’s Motion to Compel the Production of Documents and Deposition Testimony Improperly Withheld on the Basis of Privilege (Def.’s Reply or Reply). Defendant moves the court “to compel the production of…

2Cases cited78 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. NoblesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  5. Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Deseret Management Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  2. Ropes & Gray LLP v. JalbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2009
  3. Lindley v. Life Investors InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2010
  4. Rocky Mountain Wild v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
  5. Oasis International Waters, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API