Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon Horowitz
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided October 9, 1973No. 943, Docket 73-1570PublishedCited by 302 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge:
Attorneys for Alexander and Elizabeth Kasser 1 appeal from an order of the District Court for the Southern District of New York which refused, save in certain respects hereafter indicated, to quash a subpoena duces tecum requiring the Kassers’ accountant, Simon Horowitz, to produce before a federal grand jury “the contents of all three file cabinets at 248 Lorraine Avenue, Upper Montclair, N.J., Office No. 4.”
Although the record is exceedingly meagre, the factual background seems to be substantially as follows:
The ease springs from a plan of the Manitoba Development…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by302 opinions
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- In Re: Grand Jury Proceedings United States of America v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
297 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.