United States v. Jay Nagy
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
Jay J. Nagy appeals his mandatory minimum sentence of fifteen years’ imprisonment for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, and for knowingly possessing a stolen firearm. Nagy argues that his sentence violates his Sixth Amendment rights because his three prior convictions, which enhanced his sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), were not submitted to the jury or proven beyond a reasonable doubt, as required by the Supreme Court’s decision in Alleyne v. United States, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013).…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Malik FarradCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Christopher MateenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Arthur SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Edward YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.