Legal Opinion

United States v. Jay Nagy

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 24, 2014No. 13-4151PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

Jay J. Nagy appeals his mandatory minimum sentence of fifteen years’ imprisonment for being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition, and for knowingly possessing a stolen firearm. Nagy argues that his sentence violates his Sixth Amendment rights because his three prior convictions, which enhanced his sentence under the Armed Career Criminal Act, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e), were not submitted to the jury or proven beyond a reasonable doubt, as required by the Supreme Court’s decision in Alleyne v. United States, — U.S. -, 133 S.Ct. 2151, 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013).…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. Malik FarradCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Christopher MateenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. Arthur SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Edward YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API