Legal Opinion

United States v. Malik Farrad

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 17, 2018No. 16-5102/6730PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Although the phrase "going undercover" may still connote high-stakes masquerading, twenty-first century undercover investigations can begin and end in cyberspace. This case stems from an undercover investigation on Facebook. The subject of the investigation, Defendant-Appellant Malik Farrad, was a felon prohibited by federal law from possessing a firearm. In June 2015, after a two-day trial, a jury found Farrad guilty of breaking that prohibition. No physical evidence was presented, no witness claimed to have seen Farrad with a gun, and Farrad himself never…

2Cases cited79 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Cynthia Madej v. Jeff MaidenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Keli DunnicanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Bryshun FurlowCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Susan PiochCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  5. United States v. Vazquez-SotoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API