Legal Opinion

United States v. Christopher Mateen

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 3, 2015No. 14-4165PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge.

A federal statute prohibiting the sale, distribution, and possession of child pornography includes a sentencing enhancement that applies to offenders with a prior conviction “under the laws of any State relating to ... sexual abuse.” 18 U.S.C. § 2252(b)(2). Christopher Mateen pled guilty to possession of child pornography in violation of section 2252, and he appeals the district court’s decision to apply the statutory sentencing enhancement. At issue is whether Mateen’s 2006 Ohio conviction for gross sexual imposition in violation of Ohio Revised Code…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. United States v. BennettCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. Nelida Cabeda v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  3. United States v. Richard KraemerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  4. United States v. Timothy HardinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. Tywan Montrease SykesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API