Legal Opinion

United States v. Edward Young

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 11, 2014No. 13-5714PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The court delivered a PER CURIAM opinion. STRANCH, J. (pp. 630-34), delivered a separate concurring opinion.

OPINION

2Per curiam

Edward Young received a mandatory fifteen-year prison sentence for the crime of possessing seven shotgun shells in a drawer. He came into possession of the shells while helping a neighbor sell her late husband’s possessions. When he eventually discovered them, he did not realize that his legal disability against possessing firearms — resulting from felonies committed some twenty years earlier — extended to ammunition. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Under the Armed Career Criminal Act…

3Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. James Fouts v. Warren City CouncilCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2024
  3. State v. RyanOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  4. United States v. Travis GentryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
  5. United States v. McQueenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API