Legal Opinion

United States v. Arthur Smith

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 7, 2018No. 16-6720PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROGERS, Circuit Judge.

Arthur Smith was sentenced as a career offender based in part on his prior North Carolina state conviction for common-law robbery. In this appeal, he contends that North Carolina common-law robbery does not qualify as a “crime of violence” within the meaning of § 4Bl.l(a) of the United States Sentencing Guidelines. This is the second time Smith has asked us to resolve this question. In 2014, another panel of this court heard Smith’s case and concluded that North Carolina common-law robbery indeed qualifies as a crime of violence under the Guidelines’ so-called…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. United States v. Angelo GoldstonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Jeffery HavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Daniel MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
  4. Davis v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2020
  5. Stitt v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API