Legal Opinion

Steele v. Pfeifer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1981No. 13202PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunn, Justice

(on reassignment).

This is an appeal from a judgment in a quiet title action subjecting the land in question to the terms and conditions of an easement for the use of a water well. We affirm.

In 1958 Howard and Selma Ahrendt (Ah-rendts) purchased Lots 2, 3, 20, and Tract A of Lot 19; Carl W. (Carl) and Ada (Ada) Pfeifer purchased Lots 1 and 21; Loren (Loren) and Phyllis (Phyllis) Pfeifer purchased Lots 4, 5, 18, and Tract B of Lot 19. At the time of these purchases, these lots *784were outside the city limits of Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

There was no public water supply to the properties, but Lot…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Hilde v. FloodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Stotzenberger v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  4. Cuka v. Jamesville Hutterian Mutual SocietySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Riley v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vander Heide v. Boke Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Peterson v. BeckSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Townsend v. Yankton Super 8 Motel, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Brown v. CahansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Tan Corp. v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API