Brown v. Cahanson
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] James Hanson appeals from a summary judgment granted in a declaratory judgment action in favor of Terry Brown and Susan Brown (Browns) concerning the question of whether Hanson was entitled to rescind a Common Well and Road Easement Agreement (Easement Agreement). We affirm.-
FACTS
[¶2.] Browns and Hanson own adjoining real property in Meade County, South Dakota. A well that provides water to both properties is located on Hanson’s property. On June 14, 2000, Browns and Hanson entered into the Easement Agreement giving Browns the right to access water from the well for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Jones v. Guaranty & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Hendrix v. SchulteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Gilbert v. K.T.I., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Schulte v. PROGRESSIVE NORTHERN INSURANCE COMPANYSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Crimmins v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brandt v. County of PenningtonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- DeHaven v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Macy Elevator, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- STROM TRUST v. SCS CARBON TRANSPORT, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Brown v. HansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.