Legal Opinion

Stotzenberger v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 16, 1933PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHays, J.

This is a suit for injunction. Plaintiff prevailed in the circuit court and the ease is here on defendant’s appeal. The parties are adjoining proprietors of agricultural lands. The controversy grew out of conflicting claims with regard to a parcel of land described in the record as a roadway. The plaintiff owns the west one-half of the northwest quarter of section thirteen (13); the defendant owns an eighty-acre tract adjoining that tract on the north and described as the south one-half of the southwest quarter of section twelve (12) ■ all being in township forty-seven (47), range nineteen…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Snoddy v. BolenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Claflin v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Walton v. DrumtraSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. McCullock v. HolmesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  5. Carter v. FosterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Brown v. WeareSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  2. Franck Bros., Inc. v. RoseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. Baum v. Glen Park PropertiesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Missouri Public Service Company v. ArgenbrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
  5. Heigert v. Londell Manor, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API