Legal Opinion
Tan Corp. v. Johnson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 30, 1996No. NonePublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Tan Corporation, Michael Howes and Dan Vrooman (Plaintiffs) brought an action to establish an easement for ingress and egress between property owned by them and certain property owned by Dr. Jorge Johnson (Johnson). Johnson cross-claimed to quiet title. The trial court entered judgment for Plaintiffs and denied Johnson’s motion to quiet title. Johnson appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2] The property in dispute is located in Tracts 2 and 3 of a commercial development known as Cherry Creek Addition to Sioux Falls and is bounded on the west by Cleveland Avenue and on the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- De Smet Insurance Co. of South Dakota v. GibsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Madson v. BallouSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
- Townsend v. Yankton Super 8 Motel, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Wiege v. KnockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Steele v. PfeiferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vander Heide v. Boke Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
- Kokesh v. RunningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Wildwood Ass'n v. Harley F. Taylor, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Vander Heide v. Boke Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007