Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Beck

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1995No. 18876PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

Defendants Beck, et al. and VBC, Inc. (collectively referred to as VBC) appeal the trial court’s finding that an implied easement existed over their property in favor of Merton C. Peterson and family (Peterson). We affirm.

FACTS

Peterson owns and operates Cactus Heights Country Club, a private golf course (Golf Course) in Sioux Falls, which is surrounded by a residential area. 1 In 1964, Peterson’s parents (Merton H. Peterson and Patricia L. Peterson, hereinafter, Grantor) entered into an agreement to sell property adjoining the Golf Course to the American Legion Club, Post…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Voelker v. VoelkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Smith v. SponheimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Northwest Realty Co. v. JacobsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of Winner v. Bechtold Investments, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Nelson v. Gregory CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Vander Heide v. Boke Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Fenner v. Trimac Transportation, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Thompson v. E.I.G. Palace Mall, LLCSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Kokesh v. RunningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Wandler v. LewisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API