Legal Opinion

John Deere Plow Co. v. Shellabarger

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1918PublishedCited by 8 opinions

FROM MADISON. Appeal from tlie Chancery Court of Madison County. — HoN. J. W. Ross, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice GreeN

The bill in this case was filed by the John Deere Plow Company to recover on an account against the defendant, Shellabarger. Shellabarger answered, admitting that the account was substantially correct, but set up by cross-bill a claim against the Plow Company for damages for breach of a contract to purchase lumber.

Considerable proof was taken, and the chancellor found that Shellabarger was indebted to the Plow *125Company at the time of the filing of the bill in the sum of $1,072.34. He further found that the Plow Company had breached the lumber contract and that Shellabarger was entitled to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cahen v. . PlattNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. J. W. Ellison, Son & Co. v. Flat Top Grocery Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Hardwick v. American Can Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Gardner v. DeedsTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Ross-Meehan Foundry Co. v. Royer Wheel Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1904

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. City of LawrenceburgCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  2. Hennessee v. Wood Group Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  3. Tennessee Fertilizer Co. v. International Agr. Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  4. John P. Saad & Sons, Inc. v. Nashville Thermal Transfer Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Hogan v. Coyne International Enterprises Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API