Legal Opinion

Hardwick v. American Can Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1904PublishedCited by 24 opinions

FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County. —T. M. McConnell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the Court

M'r. Justice Neil

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The complainant, trading under the name of “The Cleveland Stove Works,” entered into the following contract with the defendant company, viz.:

“The Cleveland Stove Works, of Cleveland, Tennessee, contracts and agrees to ship to the order of the American Can Company, of Atlanta, Georgia, five thousand or more stoves, which are to be shipped within one year from date.” There were other provisions not necessary to set forth here, but which, so far as may be required, will be stated later, in their appropriate place.

The bill in the present case…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Minnesota Lumber Co. v. Whitebreast Coal Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1895
  2. National Furnace Co. v. Keystone Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Van Brocklen v. . SmeallieNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. John A. Roebling's Sons' Co. v. Lock Stitch Fence Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Hickey v. O'BrienMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Individual Healthcare Specialists, Inc. v. Bluecross Blueshield of Tennessee, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  3. Gwin v. Hopkinsville Milling Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  4. Cannon v. ChadwellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1940
  5. Gardner v. DeedsTennessee Supreme Court · 1905

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API