Ross-Meehan Foundry Co. v. Royer Wheel Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County. — T. M. McConnell, Chancellor.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beard
The controversy in this case grows out of a contract entered into on the 28th of March, 1899, between the complainant company and the Koyer Wheel Company, by which the first party agreed to make for the second party, from metal patterns to be furnished by the second party, all malleable or other castings required, as set out in the contract, and the second party agreed to order from the first party all such castings as were required by it between the first day of September, 1899, and the first of September, 1903, and to"pay for such castings as were delivered under the contract in sixty days…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Lowber v. BangsSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Davison v. Von LingenSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Branch, Sons & Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- McGrath v. GegnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tennessee Fertilizer Co. v. International Agr. Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- L.A. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Amalgamated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Rhea v. Marko Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1983
- Wildberg Box Co. v. DarbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
- John Deere Plow Co. v. ShellabargerTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.