Legal Opinion

Tennessee Fertilizer Co. v. International Agr. Corp.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1921PublishedCited by 38 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. —Hon. James B. Newman, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bachman

This suit was instituted by the Tennessee Fertilizer Company to recover damages of the International Agricul tural Corporation for tbe breach of a contract for the sale and delivery of sulphuric acid. The chancellor decreed in favor of the complainants, holding that the cancellation by the seller was unwarranted, and the buyer entitled to recover the difference between the contract price and market price at delivery dates, the amount of damages being fixed through reference in the sum of $479,788.11. Both parties have appealed and assigned errors to the decree of the chancellor.

The facts áre…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Norrington v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Taylor v. . GoeletNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. Monson v. BragdonIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Railroad v. Cabinet Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Texas Co. v. Pensacola Maritime Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1922

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Sartain v. Dixie Coal & Iron Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Black v. Love & Amos Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  3. Southern Const. Co. v. HalliburtonTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  4. John P. Saad & Sons, Inc. v. Nashville Thermal Transfer Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  5. New England Mut. Life Ins. v. ReeceTennessee Supreme Court · 1935

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API