Hogan v. Coyne International Enterprises Corp.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
1Opinion
OPINION ON PETITION TO REHEAR
Both parties have filed petitions to rehear. With respect to the petition by the sellers, we have reviewed the petition and find that it does not state a ground for modification of the original opinion.
With respect to Coyne’s petition, we do not think it requires a change in result, but it does merit a specific response.
*206a.
The chief complaint in the petition is with this court’s conclusion that the sales contract was severable. We have examined the cases cited in the petition, James Cable Partners, L.P. v. City of Jamestown, 818 S.W.2d 388 (Tenn.App.1991), Penske…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. HuddlestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Bradford & Carson v. Montgomery Furniture Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1905
- Greene v. THGC, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- Turner v. BowensCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
- Young v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.