Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Deeds

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1905PublishedCited by 13 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. —John Allison, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

This cause was decided at a former da.y of the term, in which the decree of the court of chancery appeals in favor of the complainants was affirmed. It is again before the court on a petition to rehear.

The object of the bill was to recover damages for the breach of a written contract whereby the defendants, Deeds & Hirsig, purchased from the complainant, Russell» E. Gardner, five hundred buggies of specified de*130scriptions and stipulated prices. The contract contemplated that the buggies were to be ordered as needed by the purchaser. The vendor was a manufacturer doing business in the city of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore Railroad v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  3. Hinckley v. Pittsburgh Bessemer Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Black River Lumber Co. v. WarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  5. Kingman & Co. v. Western Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. City of LawrenceburgCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980
  2. Tennessee Fertilizer Co. v. International Agr. Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Koehler v. CummingsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1974
  4. Lee Shops, Inc. v. Schatten-Cypress CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  5. Joest v. John A. Denie's Sons Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1939

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API