Legal Opinion

Boss v. Silent Drama Syndicate

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1927No. Docket No. 4574PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

At the time when the cause of action herein accrued the defendant Silent Drama Syndicate was an unincorporated association operating by virtue of a trust agreement under which defendants Graydon and Brown were its trustees. The business or property of the syndicate was divided into shares of the par value of $100 each, of which one Keady was the owner of 220 shares evidenced by a certificate of stock to that effect. For the sum of $500 in cash paid to him by Otto J. Boss (the plaintiff herein), Keady sold to Boss five shares of such syndicate; and thereupon Keady surrendered his certificate…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Domenigoni v. Imperial Live Stock & Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Tome v. Parkersburg Branch RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  4. In Re GirardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Green v. Caribou Oil Min. Co.California Supreme Court · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Pollak v. StauntonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Miller v. California Roofing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. Clejan v. ReismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Anglo California Nat. Bank of San Francisco v. LazardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API