In Re Girard
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. Denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
The petitioner alleges that he is unlawfully imprisoned by the sheriff of the county of Los Angeles upon a warrant of arrest issued out of the justice court of Los Angeles township upon a complaint which fails to charge a public offense.
The complaint charges that the Crystal & Colored Glass Company was a company of which four persons, namely, Mayer, Marshall, Stevenson, and the petitioner Girard, were trustees, and that neither' said company nor any of said trustees thereof had plained any permit from the commissioner of corporations to issue or sell any of the securities of the company or…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In Re SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- County of San Luis Obispo v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3Cited by28 opinions
- Mary Pickford Co. v. Bayly Bros., Inc.California Supreme Court · 1939
- People v. PaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- State Street Trust Co. v. HallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- Tatlebaum v. Pantex Manufacturing Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- People v. EisemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.