Cain v. Richmond
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
LANDIS, J., pro tem.
In payment of a part of the purchase price of certain real property sold by plaintiffs to defendants on December 18, 1922, defendants executed and delivered to plaintiffs their promissory note in writing in the sum of $18,000 and interest, payable five years after date, and to secure the payment of said note executed on the same date a trust deed covering the said real property. Defendants having failed to pay the note when due, the property was sold under and pursuant to the terms of said trust deed for the sum of $10,000. By this action plaintiffs seek to recover the sum…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frey v. CliffordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Paulding v. . the Chrome Steel CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Reay v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Van Riper v. PoppenhausenNew York Court of Appeals · 1870
- Hopkins v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Miller v. KeeganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Estate of Boggs v. BoggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Horton v. KyburzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Gaspar v. United Milk Producers of Cal.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Carter v. CarterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.