Hopkins v. White
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County and from an order denying.a new trial. Thos. C. Denny, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action to have a certain assignment of the interest of defendant Harriette Macnider, in her deceased father's estate, declared void. Plaintiff had judgment from which and from the order denying their motion for a new trial, defendants appeal.
It is alleged in the amended complaint that, on August 18, 1908, the defendants executed and delivered to plaintiff their promissory note for $1,679.40 and that, on August 2, 1910, plaintiff obtained a judgment against defendants, in an action upon said promissory note, for the sum of $1,702.40 and that said judgment is now in full force; that,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Goad v. MontgomeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- More v. MoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Toland v. EarlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- McKee v. Title Insurance Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
- Jenner v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Kalt v. YoungworthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Rogers v. SchlotterbackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Stenson v. H. S. Halvorson Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
- Wright v. SalzbergerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.