Legal Opinion

Gaspar v. United Milk Producers of Cal.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 26, 1944No. Civ. 12464PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOOLING, J. pro tem.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in an action upon a contract in which defendant agreed to purchase from plaintiff at a minimum price of $10 per share not to exceed 413 shares of the capital stock of Dariglen Creameries, Ltd., in the event plaintiff within seven years shall “be discharged from those duties which he is now performing for said corporation, save and except his duties now performed by him as president of said corporation or as an official thereof.”

Dariglen Creameries, Ltd. was a corporation engaged in the bottling and sale of milk.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Merchants Trust Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Matthews v. Minnesota Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  3. White v. Lumiere North American Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1906
  4. Stone v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Stone v. BancroftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re Public Ledger, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
  2. Aggregates Associated, Inc. v. PackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Shunk v. Shunk Mfg. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Thermo-Kinetic Corporation v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. In Re Elliott Wholesale Grocery Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1951

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API