Legal Opinion
Novick v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 17, 2012No. Court No. 09 Civ. 6865(RKE)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION and ORDER
RICHARD K. EATON, District Judge.
Eaton, Judge: Plaintiff Karen Novick brings this action under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (2006). By her complaint, Ms. Novick alleges that defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (“MetLife”), Ms. Novick’s employer and ERISA plan administrator, wrongfully terminated her short-term disability (“STD”) benefits and wrongfully denied her long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits under the terms of the MetLife Options & Choices Plan No. 512 (the “Plan”). Compl. ¶45 (ECF Dkt No. 1).…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- George MONGEUR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- S.M. v. Oxford Health Plans (N.Y.), Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- DeCesare v. Aetna Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Easter v. Cayuga Medical Center at Ithaca Prepaid Health PlanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2016
- Rao v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015
- Feltington v. Hartford Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.