Legal Opinion

City and County of San Francisco v. Transbay Const. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 19, 1943No. 10168PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEADY, Circuit Judge.

This suit involves a contract between Transbay Construction Company and the City of San Francisco for the elevation of the O’Shaughnessy Dam, a structure erected by the city a number of years ago on the Tuolumne River in Yosemite National Park. Jurisdiction is conferred by diversity of citizenship.

As originally constructed, the dam was of the arched gravity type with a height of 226 feet above stream bed and a length of 600 feet across the canyon through which the Tuolumne flows. The city desired to raise the height of the dam 85 feet. On December 7, 1934, proposals to'…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Salt Lake City v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  2. Borough Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Cal. Farm & Fruit Co. v. Schiappa-PietraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Gogo v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Lentilhon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
  2. McGuire & Hester v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Lee C. Hess Co. v. City of SusanvilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Seaboard Surety Co., a Corporate Entity, Etc. v. United States of America for Use and Benefit of C.D.G., Inc., a Corporate EntityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  5. M. De Matteo Construction Co. v. Maine Turnpike AuthorityDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API